Harvey Spencer Lewis - Revision history

AccountManager: AccountManager moved page Auteur:Harvey Spencer Lewis to Harvey Spencer Lewis: Misspelled title

2026-01-03T23:09:30Z

AccountManager moved page Auteur:Harvey Spencer Lewis to Harvey Spencer Lewis: Misspelled title

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:09, 3 January 2026
(No difference)

AccountManager: /* Verification Status: */

2025-12-28T21:09:17Z

Verification Status:

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 28 December 2025
Line 272:		Line 272:
	\|-		\|-
	\| Intellectual Works and Technical Innovations		\| Intellectual Works and Technical Innovations
	~~\| style="background-color: #ffcccc; color: #000;" \| 0% (Not yet verified)~~
	\|-
	~~\| Technical and Scientific Innovations~~
	\| style="background-color: #ffcccc; color: #000;" \| 0% (Not yet verified)		\| style="background-color: #ffcccc; color: #000;" \| 0% (Not yet verified)
	\|-		\|-

AccountManager: /* Accusations of Fraud and Lack of Authenticity */

2025-12-28T20:59:36Z

Accusations of Fraud and Lack of Authenticity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 28 December 2025
Line 114:		Line 114:
	=== Accusations of Fraud and Lack of Authenticity ===		=== Accusations of Fraud and Lack of Authenticity ===
	In response to the attacks, AMORC published material describing Clymer's ideas as "some of the strangest notions that a human mind has ever harbored," emphasizing that his positions were "self-designated and self-conceived."<ref>AMORC Publications (1929). ''Defense of the Rosicrucian Order''. San Jose: AMORC, pp. 23-26.</ref>		In response to the attacks, AMORC published material describing Clymer's ideas as "some of the strangest notions that a human mind has ever harbored," emphasizing that his positions were "self-designated and self-conceived."<ref>AMORC Publications (1929). ''Defense of the Rosicrucian Order''. San Jose: AMORC, pp. 23-26.</ref>

	Clymer retaliated by raising suspicions about Lewis's doctorate, accusing him of selling inauthentic works, and practicing black magic due to his association with Aleister Crowley.<ref name="Clymer"/> These accusations struck at the heart of Lewis's legitimacy as a spiritual leader.<ref>McIntosh, C. (1997). ''The Rosicrucians''. York Beach: Samuel Weiser, pp. 120-121.</ref>		Clymer retaliated by raising suspicions about Lewis's doctorate, accusing him of selling inauthentic works, and practicing black magic due to his association with Aleister Crowley.<ref name="Clymer"/> These accusations struck at the heart of Lewis's legitimacy as a spiritual leader.<ref>McIntosh, C. (1997). ''The Rosicrucians''. York Beach: Samuel Weiser, pp. 120-121.</ref>

	=== Rival Federations: FUDOSI vs FUDOFSI ===		=== Rival Federations: FUDOSI vs FUDOFSI ===
	In [[1934]], Lewis united AMORC with 14 other secret societies and formed the Universal Federation of Initiatic Orders and Societies (FUDOSI).<ref name="FUDOSI"/> Their objective was to call for common action against the dishonor caused by "clandestine organizations" like Clymer's.<ref>Bogdan, H. & Snoek, J.A.M. (eds.) (2014). ''Handbook of Freemasonry''. Leiden: Brill, p. 571.</ref>		In [[1934]], Lewis united AMORC with 14 other secret societies and formed the Universal Federation of Initiatic Orders and Societies (FUDOSI).<ref name="FUDOSI"/> Their objective was to call for common action against the dishonor caused by "clandestine organizations" like Clymer's.<ref>Bogdan, H. & Snoek, J.A.M. (eds.) (2014). ''Handbook of Freemasonry''. Leiden: Brill, p. 571.</ref>

AccountManager: /* Martinist Involvement */

2025-12-28T20:57:23Z

Martinist Involvement

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 28 December 2025
Line 71:		Line 71:
	=== Martinist Involvement ===		=== Martinist Involvement ===
	In [[1934]], Lewis was appointed by [[Augustin Chaboseau]] as legate of the traditional [[Martinist Order]] for the United States of America.<ref name="Martinist">Bogdan, H. (2007). "Western Esotericism and Rituals of Initiation". ''Journal of Religious History'', 31(1), pp. 12-14.</ref> This appointment testifies to the recognition Lewis enjoyed in certain European esoteric circles. In August [[1934]], [[Victor Blanchard]] initiated Lewis into the first degree of the Martinist Order, and he received the following degrees in [[Brussels]] and [[Lausanne]] in the following days.<ref name="Martinist"/>		In [[1934]], Lewis was appointed by [[Augustin Chaboseau]] as legate of the traditional [[Martinist Order]] for the United States of America.<ref name="Martinist">Bogdan, H. (2007). "Western Esotericism and Rituals of Initiation". ''Journal of Religious History'', 31(1), pp. 12-14.</ref> This appointment testifies to the recognition Lewis enjoyed in certain European esoteric circles. In August [[1934]], [[Victor Blanchard]] initiated Lewis into the first degree of the Martinist Order, and he received the following degrees in [[Brussels]] and [[Lausanne]] in the following days.<ref name="Martinist"/>

	This involvement in Martinism reveals Lewis's desire to establish bridges between different Western esoteric traditions, a strategy that contributed to enriching AMORC's teachings but also raised questions about the doctrinal coherence of the organization.<ref>Hanegraaff, W.J. (2012). ''Esotericism and the Academy''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238-240.</ref>		This involvement in Martinism reveals Lewis's desire to establish bridges between different Western esoteric traditions, a strategy that contributed to enriching AMORC's teachings but also raised questions about the doctrinal coherence of the organization.<ref>Hanegraaff, W.J. (2012). ''Esotericism and the Academy''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238-240.</ref>

	=== FUDOSI and International Alliances ===		=== FUDOSI and International Alliances ===
	In August [[1934]], an international Convent of initiatic orders was organized in [[Brussels]] where '''FUDOSI''' ('''Fédération Universelle des Ordres et Sociétés Initiatiques''' - Universal Federation of Initiatic Orders and Societies) was created.<ref name="FUDOSI">FUDOSI Archives (1934). ''Proceedings of the Brussels Convent'', August 14-16, 1934.</ref> This federation, of which Lewis became one of the three Imperators under the mystical name '''Sar Alden''', represented an ambitious attempt to unify traditional esoteric orders.<ref name="FUDOSI"/>		In August [[1934]], an international Convent of initiatic orders was organized in [[Brussels]] where '''FUDOSI''' ('''Fédération Universelle des Ordres et Sociétés Initiatiques''' - Universal Federation of Initiatic Orders and Societies) was created.<ref name="FUDOSI">FUDOSI Archives (1934). ''Proceedings of the Brussels Convent'', August 14-16, 1934.</ref> This federation, of which Lewis became one of the three Imperators under the mystical name '''Sar Alden''', represented an ambitious attempt to unify traditional esoteric orders.<ref name="FUDOSI"/>

AccountManager: /* Establishment in San Jose, California */

2025-12-28T20:56:59Z

Establishment in San Jose, California

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 28 December 2025
Line 63:		Line 63:
	=== Establishment in San Jose, California ===		=== Establishment in San Jose, California ===
	In [[1927]], Lewis founded the '''Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum''' in [[San Jose, California\|San Jose]], [[California]], which was officially recognized as a full Museum by the [[International Council of Museums]] (ICOM).<ref>ICOM Records (1928). ''Museum Registration Documents'', San Jose Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum.</ref> This move to California was part of a broader trend of American esoteric movements to establish themselves on the West Coast, a region perceived as more open to alternative spiritualities.<ref>Versluis, A. (2007). ''Magic and Mysticism''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 151-153.</ref>		In [[1927]], Lewis founded the '''Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum''' in [[San Jose, California\|San Jose]], [[California]], which was officially recognized as a full Museum by the [[International Council of Museums]] (ICOM).<ref>ICOM Records (1928). ''Museum Registration Documents'', San Jose Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum.</ref> This move to California was part of a broader trend of American esoteric movements to establish themselves on the West Coast, a region perceived as more open to alternative spiritualities.<ref>Versluis, A. (2007). ''Magic and Mysticism''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 151-153.</ref>

	The choice to create an Egyptian museum testifies to the importance Lewis placed on [[Ancient Egypt]] as a source of the Rosicrucian tradition. This Egyptophile orientation, common to many esoteric movements of the time, reflected the influence of [[Freemasonry]] and [[Theosophy]].<ref>Goodrick-Clarke, N. (2008). ''The Western Esoteric Traditions''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202-205.</ref>		The choice to create an Egyptian museum testifies to the importance Lewis placed on [[Ancient Egypt]] as a source of the Rosicrucian tradition. This Egyptophile orientation, common to many esoteric movements of the time, reflected the influence of [[Freemasonry]] and [[Theosophy]].<ref>Goodrick-Clarke, N. (2008). ''The Western Esoteric Traditions''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202-205.</ref>

	== Esoteric and International Activities (1927-1939) ==		== Esoteric and International Activities (1927-1939) ==
	=== Relations with European Orders ===		=== Relations with European Orders ===

AccountManager: /* Growth Strategies and Modernization */

2025-12-28T20:56:39Z

Growth Strategies and Modernization

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 28 December 2025
Line 56:		Line 56:
	=== Growth Strategies and Modernization ===		=== Growth Strategies and Modernization ===
	Lewis distinguished himself from his esoteric predecessors by his innovative use of modern communication and marketing techniques. Having experience in advertising as an illustrator, Lewis launched an advertising campaign for AMORC in dozens of American magazines, thus recruiting thousands of students.<ref>Urban, H.B. (2006). ''Magia Sexualis''. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 179-181.</ref>		Lewis distinguished himself from his esoteric predecessors by his innovative use of modern communication and marketing techniques. Having experience in advertising as an illustrator, Lewis launched an advertising campaign for AMORC in dozens of American magazines, thus recruiting thousands of students.<ref>Urban, H.B. (2006). ''Magia Sexualis''. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 179-181.</ref>

	This approach provoked sharp criticism from his rivals, notably [[Reuben Swinburne Clymer]], who denounced the commercialization of sacred teachings.<ref name="Clymer">Clymer, R.S. (1924). ''The Rosicrucian Fraternity in America''. Quakertown: Philosophical Publishing Company, pp. 156-162.</ref> However, this strategy enabled AMORC to experience rapid growth and establish itself durably in the American spiritual landscape.		This approach provoked sharp criticism from his rivals, notably [[Reuben Swinburne Clymer]], who denounced the commercialization of sacred teachings.<ref name="Clymer">Clymer, R.S. (1924). ''The Rosicrucian Fraternity in America''. Quakertown: Philosophical Publishing Company, pp. 156-162.</ref> However, this strategy enabled AMORC to experience rapid growth and establish itself durably in the American spiritual landscape.

	Lewis also developed a correspondence course system, a major innovation in the transmission of esoteric knowledge.<ref>Partridge, C. (ed.) (2004). ''New Religions: A Guide''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 158-159.</ref> Lewis developed an extensive series of monographs exclusively for AMORC members, serving as fundamental instructional materials for the order's curriculum. This system allowed for large-scale dissemination while maintaining quality control and gradual progression of initiates.<ref>Lewis, R.M. (1966). ''Cosmic Mission Fulfilled'', pp. 78-82.</ref>		Lewis also developed a correspondence course system, a major innovation in the transmission of esoteric knowledge.<ref>Partridge, C. (ed.) (2004). ''New Religions: A Guide''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 158-159.</ref> Lewis developed an extensive series of monographs exclusively for AMORC members, serving as fundamental instructional materials for the order's curriculum. This system allowed for large-scale dissemination while maintaining quality control and gradual progression of initiates.<ref>Lewis, R.M. (1966). ''Cosmic Mission Fulfilled'', pp. 78-82.</ref>

	=== Establishment in San Jose, California ===		=== Establishment in San Jose, California ===
	In [[1927]], Lewis founded the '''Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum''' in [[San Jose, California\|San Jose]], [[California]], which was officially recognized as a full Museum by the [[International Council of Museums]] (ICOM).<ref>ICOM Records (1928). ''Museum Registration Documents'', San Jose Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum.</ref> This move to California was part of a broader trend of American esoteric movements to establish themselves on the West Coast, a region perceived as more open to alternative spiritualities.<ref>Versluis, A. (2007). ''Magic and Mysticism''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 151-153.</ref>		In [[1927]], Lewis founded the '''Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum''' in [[San Jose, California\|San Jose]], [[California]], which was officially recognized as a full Museum by the [[International Council of Museums]] (ICOM).<ref>ICOM Records (1928). ''Museum Registration Documents'', San Jose Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum.</ref> This move to California was part of a broader trend of American esoteric movements to establish themselves on the West Coast, a region perceived as more open to alternative spiritualities.<ref>Versluis, A. (2007). ''Magic and Mysticism''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 151-153.</ref>

AccountManager: /* The Formal Creation of the Order */

2025-12-28T20:56:15Z

The Formal Creation of the Order

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 28 December 2025
Line 51:		Line 51:
	=== The Formal Creation of the Order ===		=== The Formal Creation of the Order ===
	The project to revive Rosicrucian activities in the United States was first the subject of a public communication in [[New York City\|New York]] in February [[1915]], followed by a lecture on {{Date\|March 3}}.<ref name="founding">AMORC Official Records (1915). ''Minutes of the First Assembly'', April 1, 1915.</ref> The first assembly composed of about fifty members was held on {{Date\|April 1, 1915}}. This chronology reveals a methodical and public approach, contrasting with the secrecy traditionally associated with esoteric orders.<ref>Bogdan, H. & Snoek, J.A.M. (eds.) (2014). ''Handbook of Freemasonry''. Leiden: Brill, pp. 567-570.</ref>		The project to revive Rosicrucian activities in the United States was first the subject of a public communication in [[New York City\|New York]] in February [[1915]], followed by a lecture on {{Date\|March 3}}.<ref name="founding">AMORC Official Records (1915). ''Minutes of the First Assembly'', April 1, 1915.</ref> The first assembly composed of about fifty members was held on {{Date\|April 1, 1915}}. This chronology reveals a methodical and public approach, contrasting with the secrecy traditionally associated with esoteric orders.<ref>Bogdan, H. & Snoek, J.A.M. (eds.) (2014). ''Handbook of Freemasonry''. Leiden: Brill, pp. 567-570.</ref>

	On this occasion, Lewis was elected '''Imperator''', a traditional title in use since the 17th century, used to designate the highest dignitary of the organization.<ref name="founding"/> The twelve-degree Rosicrucian hierarchical structure, known since [[1777]], was also adopted.<ref>Yates, F.A. (1972). ''The Rosicrucian Enlightenment''. London: Routledge, pp. 234-237.</ref>		On this occasion, Lewis was elected '''Imperator''', a traditional title in use since the 17th century, used to designate the highest dignitary of the organization.<ref name="founding"/> The twelve-degree Rosicrucian hierarchical structure, known since [[1777]], was also adopted.<ref>Yates, F.A. (1972). ''The Rosicrucian Enlightenment''. London: Routledge, pp. 234-237.</ref>

	=== Growth Strategies and Modernization ===		=== Growth Strategies and Modernization ===
	Lewis distinguished himself from his esoteric predecessors by his innovative use of modern communication and marketing techniques. Having experience in advertising as an illustrator, Lewis launched an advertising campaign for AMORC in dozens of American magazines, thus recruiting thousands of students.<ref>Urban, H.B. (2006). ''Magia Sexualis''. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 179-181.</ref>		Lewis distinguished himself from his esoteric predecessors by his innovative use of modern communication and marketing techniques. Having experience in advertising as an illustrator, Lewis launched an advertising campaign for AMORC in dozens of American magazines, thus recruiting thousands of students.<ref>Urban, H.B. (2006). ''Magia Sexualis''. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 179-181.</ref>

AccountManager: /* Controversies Over the Authenticity of the Initiation */

2025-12-28T20:55:49Z

Controversies Over the Authenticity of the Initiation

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 28 December 2025
Line 43:		Line 43:
	=== Controversies Over the Authenticity of the Initiation ===		=== Controversies Over the Authenticity of the Initiation ===
	Some authors question this event, indicating inconsistencies and gaps in Lewis's account.<ref>McIntosh, C. (1997). ''The Rosicrucians''. York Beach: Samuel Weiser, pp. 116-118.</ref> Critical historians highlight several problems:		Some authors question this event, indicating inconsistencies and gaps in Lewis's account.<ref>McIntosh, C. (1997). ''The Rosicrucians''. York Beach: Samuel Weiser, pp. 116-118.</ref> Critical historians highlight several problems:
	'''The absence of independent documentation''': No contemporary French source confirms the existence of an active Rosicrucian branch in Toulouse in 1909.<ref>Faivre, A. (1992). ''L'ésotérisme''. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 89-92.</ref>		# '''The absence of independent documentation''': No contemporary French source confirms the existence of an active Rosicrucian branch in Toulouse in 1909.<ref>Faivre, A. (1992). ''L'ésotérisme''. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 89-92.</ref>
	'''Links with the Parisian esoteric scene''': One might wonder why Lewis's interlocutors did not recommend that he contact those who, at that time, were notoriously known for their Rosicrucian activities, particularly [[Joséphin Péladan]] and [[Papus]].<ref>Hanegraaff, W.J. (2012). ''Esotericism and the Academy''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236-237.</ref>		# '''Links with the Parisian esoteric scene''': One might wonder why Lewis's interlocutors did not recommend that he contact those who, at that time, were notoriously known for their Rosicrucian activities, particularly [[Joséphin Péladan]] and [[Papus]].<ref>Hanegraaff, W.J. (2012). ''Esotericism and the Academy''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236-237.</ref>
	'''The question of May Banks-Stacey''': According to Lewis, May Banks-Stacey, presented as a descendant of American Rosicrucians, gave him a chest and documents with Rosicrucian symbols he had seen in Toulouse in 1909.<ref name="Lewis1966"/>		# '''The question of May Banks-Stacey''': According to Lewis, May Banks-Stacey, presented as a descendant of American Rosicrucians, gave him a chest and documents with Rosicrucian symbols he had seen in Toulouse in 1909.<ref name="Lewis1966"/>
	These controversies should not, however, obscure the possibility that Lewis was indeed in contact with French esoteric circles, even if the exact nature and extent of these contacts remain subject to debate.<ref>Introvigne, M. (2012). "Rosicrucian Orders", pp. 446-447.</ref>		These controversies should not, however, obscure the possibility that Lewis was indeed in contact with French esoteric circles, even if the exact nature and extent of these contacts remain subject to debate.<ref>Introvigne, M. (2012). "Rosicrucian Orders", pp. 446-447.</ref>

	== The Foundation and Organization of AMORC (1915-1927) ==		== The Foundation and Organization of AMORC (1915-1927) ==
	=== The Formal Creation of the Order ===		=== The Formal Creation of the Order ===

AccountManager: /* The Initiatic Journey of 1909 */

2025-12-28T20:54:41Z

The Initiatic Journey of 1909

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 28 December 2025
Line 36:		Line 36:
	=== The Initiatic Journey of 1909 ===		=== The Initiatic Journey of 1909 ===
	The account of Lewis's initiation in [[France]] constitutes a central and controversial element of AMORC's history. According to his own statements, Lewis traveled to [[Toulouse]] where he was initiated on {{Date\|August 12, 1909}}, before being designated to organize a Rosicrucian resurgence in the United States.<ref>Lewis, H.S. as cited in Lewis, R.M. (1966). ''Cosmic Mission Fulfilled''. San Jose: AMORC, pp. 45-52.</ref> This foundational episode deserves close examination, as it is decisive for the legitimacy that AMORC would subsequently claim.		The account of Lewis's initiation in [[France]] constitutes a central and controversial element of AMORC's history. According to his own statements, Lewis traveled to [[Toulouse]] where he was initiated on {{Date\|August 12, 1909}}, before being designated to organize a Rosicrucian resurgence in the United States.<ref>Lewis, H.S. as cited in Lewis, R.M. (1966). ''Cosmic Mission Fulfilled''. San Jose: AMORC, pp. 45-52.</ref> This foundational episode deserves close examination, as it is decisive for the legitimacy that AMORC would subsequently claim.

	D'après le récit de Lewis lui-même, after his initiation into the Order of the Rose Cross on {{Date\|August 12, 1909}}, he wrote to his wife Mollie that all his hopes had been realized, but not without numerous tests and trials.<ref name="Toulouse">AMORC Archives, Personal correspondence of H.S. Lewis, August 1909.</ref> The details of this initiation, as related in his later memoirs, describe a traditional ceremony during which he allegedly received authorization to consult ancient Rosicrucian documents and copy rituals.<ref name="Toulouse"/>		D'après le récit de Lewis lui-même, after his initiation into the Order of the Rose Cross on {{Date\|August 12, 1909}}, he wrote to his wife Mollie that all his hopes had been realized, but not without numerous tests and trials.<ref name="Toulouse">AMORC Archives, Personal correspondence of H.S. Lewis, August 1909.</ref> The details of this initiation, as related in his later memoirs, describe a traditional ceremony during which he allegedly received authorization to consult ancient Rosicrucian documents and copy rituals.<ref name="Toulouse"/>

	Research suggests that Lewis met '''Clovis Lassalle''', a renowned Toulouse photographer, who allegedly guided him to the Rosicrucians. A letter dated {{Date\|August 26, 1909}} from Lassalle appears in Lewis's personal archives, partially corroborating his account.<ref>AMORC Archives, Lassalle letter to H.S. Lewis, August 26, 1909.</ref>		Research suggests that Lewis met '''Clovis Lassalle''', a renowned Toulouse photographer, who allegedly guided him to the Rosicrucians. A letter dated {{Date\|August 26, 1909}} from Lassalle appears in Lewis's personal archives, partially corroborating his account.<ref>AMORC Archives, Lassalle letter to H.S. Lewis, August 26, 1909.</ref>

	=== Controversies Over the Authenticity of the Initiation ===		=== Controversies Over the Authenticity of the Initiation ===
	Some authors question this event, indicating inconsistencies and gaps in Lewis's account.<ref>McIntosh, C. (1997). ''The Rosicrucians''. York Beach: Samuel Weiser, pp. 116-118.</ref> Critical historians highlight several problems:		Some authors question this event, indicating inconsistencies and gaps in Lewis's account.<ref>McIntosh, C. (1997). ''The Rosicrucians''. York Beach: Samuel Weiser, pp. 116-118.</ref> Critical historians highlight several problems:

AccountManager: /* Engagement in Spiritualism and Psychical Research */

2025-12-28T20:53:52Z

Engagement in Spiritualism and Psychical Research

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 28 December 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:
	=== Engagement in Spiritualism and Psychical Research ===		=== Engagement in Spiritualism and Psychical Research ===
	From [[1904]] to [[1909]], Lewis led the '''New York Institute for Psychical Research''', a group composed of scientists and scholars, dedicated to studying mediums as well as spiritualist and psychic phenomena.<ref name="Lewis1966"/> This period is crucial for understanding Lewis's intellectual evolution. The beginning of the 20th century saw the peak of the [[Spiritualism\|spiritualist]] movement in the United States, in a context where the boundaries between science, pseudo-science and [[occultism]] were still porous.<ref>Versluis, A. (2007). ''Magic and Mysticism: An Introduction to Western Esotericism''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 145-149.</ref>		From [[1904]] to [[1909]], Lewis led the '''New York Institute for Psychical Research''', a group composed of scientists and scholars, dedicated to studying mediums as well as spiritualist and psychic phenomena.<ref name="Lewis1966"/> This period is crucial for understanding Lewis's intellectual evolution. The beginning of the 20th century saw the peak of the [[Spiritualism\|spiritualist]] movement in the United States, in a context where the boundaries between science, pseudo-science and [[occultism]] were still porous.<ref>Versluis, A. (2007). ''Magic and Mysticism: An Introduction to Western Esotericism''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 145-149.</ref>

	Lewis became a journalist and sat on a committee investigating spiritualism in [[New York City\|New York]].<ref name="Lewis1966"/> This critical investigative activity testifies to an approach that aimed to be scientific regarding paranormal phenomena, in line with the spirit of the times when many intellectuals sought to reconcile rationality and spirituality.		Lewis became a journalist and sat on a committee investigating spiritualism in [[New York City\|New York]].<ref name="Lewis1966"/> This critical investigative activity testifies to an approach that aimed to be scientific regarding paranormal phenomena, in line with the spirit of the times when many intellectuals sought to reconcile rationality and spirituality.

	== The Toulouse Initiation and American Mission (1909-1915) ==		== The Toulouse Initiation and American Mission (1909-1915) ==
	=== The Initiatic Journey of 1909 ===		=== The Initiatic Journey of 1909 ===